The organisation of football and netball leagues and pitch hire have been held to amount to the exempt grant of an interest in land, by the Upper Tribunal (UT) in the Netbusters (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 0438 (TC) (2 November 2020)
The question was is this a supply of an interest in land or a supply of sports league services?
The appellant Netbusters (UK) Limited (NUL) is registered for VAT and organises competitive football and netball leagues. It enters into binding agreements with third parties, such as local authorities and schools, to hire venues belonging to these third parties for set periods of time. It then hires these venues to its customers. It also organises competitive football and netball leagues and most of the pitches are hired by teams participating in one of its leagues, either as a block booking for the season or one-off bookings.
It submitted a claim for over declared output tax, on the basis that its main supply was that of an exempt supply of land. HMRC disagreed and NUL appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT).
The FTT allowed NUL’s earlier appeal, finding that the objective character of its supplies was such that they are properly categorised as the granting of interests in, rights over or licenses to occupy land.
HMRC appealed to the FTT decision to the Upper Tribunal (UT) on several grounds including that it was made in error of law. HMRC submitted that the FTT should have concluded that the objective character or economic reality of NUL’s supplies was not the grant of a licence to occupy land but, rather, a supply of competitive league sports management services.
The UT dismissed HMRC’s appeal on all Grounds. The FTT applied the correct tests in law and was entitled to reach the conclusion it did on the evidence available to it, irrespective of whether the UT would have come to the same conclusion.
Comments
Should you have any clients involved in letting facilities in similar circumstances they should consider whether this decision could impact current VAT accounting. Netbusters is an important case that could allow a claim of overpaid output tax to HMRC.
HMRC has yet to release updated guidance accepting the VAT treatment in line with the Upper Tribunal decision.
If you wish to read more, please see the link to the case below:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62c83545d3bf7f2ffd7c752c/HMRC_v_Netbusters_UT-2021-000044_.pdf
Please do contact us, if you have any queries or would like to discuss submitting a claim on this basis.
Related News Articles
Granting Shares Options to non-employees/Consultants
By nature of their contract for services, consultants are not eligible for any of the approved tax advantaged share option schemes in the same way that employees of a company offering incentives are. Approved share option schemes include: Enterprise Management Incentive Options (EMI scheme) Company Share Option Plan (CSOP) Share Incentive Plan (SIP) Save As…
Tax Planning Around VAT on Private School Fees
With the election date fast approaching and opinion polls predicting a change of government, clients may now be worried about one of Labour’s flagship policies, VAT on independent schools, and looking for planning opportunities to mitigate any increase in costs this causes. Labour's manifesto lacks specific implementation details, and the election campaign hasn't provided much…
Non-Dom left out FA24
After announcing an early election, the government rushed to have the Finance Bill with the 2024 Spring Budget measures passed into law. However, one of the most notable of the reforms on the Non-Domiciled Status is missing. The 2024 Spring Budget included an announcement that the rules for “non-domiciled” individuals would be completely overhauled in…