New Tax Penalty Proposals are Unfair on Taxpayers

New Tax Penalty Proposals are unfair on taxpayers

HMRC IS BEING URGED to amend proposals for a new penalty regime for late payment of tax in order to avoid unfair outcomes for taxpayers. According to the Association of Taxation Technicians (ATT), unless the plan is amended, it would mean that taxpayers who had agreed with HMRC to pay tax liabilities by instalments could incur substantial penalties even on instalments which had been paid as agreed with HMRC.

The new proposals are designed to encourage taxpayers to pay their tax liabilities on time or, failing that, to make early contact with HMRC in order to arrange a Time to Pay (TTP) agreement. Taxpayers who pay late without having arranged a TTP agreement are exposed to increasing penalties.

ATT is concerned that the proposals as drafted mean that any breach of the terms of a TTP agreement can result in that TTP agreement being treated as if it had never existed. That could leave the taxpayer exposed to the same level of penalties as if they had made no attempt to pay their liabilities on time or agree a basis of payment with HMRC. ATT has set out its concerns in a response to HMRC.

Jon Stride, Co-Chair of ATT’s Technical Steering Group, said: “We can see the sense in incentivising early contact with HMRC whenever a taxpayer has been unable to pay a tax liability by its due date. We can also see the need to prevent abuse of the TTP provisions – for example someone entering a TTP agreement with no intention of sticking to its terms.

“What really concerns us is the idea that a taxpayer who has kept to the terms of a TTP agreement and made all the instalments payments on time up until the point when, for whatever reason, they breach its terms should lose all credit for their actions up to that point and incur the same level of penalties on all the instalment payments that had been made as if there had never been a TTP agreement.

“Unless that part of the proposals is changed, we anticipate that any taxpayer in that position is likely to assert that they had a reasonable excuse for the breach in question. That will take up HMRC and possibly tribunal time and resources and delay resolution of the matter. We think that it would also open up the possibility of the tax tribunal concluding that the factual existence of the TTP agreement prior to its breach meant that the taxpayer had a reasonable excuse for paying the tax liability in accordance with that agreement rather than as a single sum on its due date.

“Our response to HMRC suggests alternative ways of achieving appropriate and proportionate penalties where a TTP agreement is breached so that the challenges to penalties which we otherwise anticipate can be avoided.

” Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is for general guidance only. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, on the basis of any such information. Professional advice should be taken based on particular circumstances, as the application of laws and regulations will vary. Please be aware that laws and regulations are also subject to frequent change. While every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this publication is correct, neither the author nor his firm shall be liable in damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from any information contained in it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of using any such information.”