FRS and transferring your VAT number

VAT Question

My client is a VAT registered sole proprietor who has been operating under the Flat Rate Scheme (FRS). His turnover is now around £200,000, and he has formed a new Ltd Co and transferred his business into that Ltd Co. This was treated as a transfer of a business as a going concern, and my client wants to retain the sole proprietor VAT number and continue to use FRS in the Ltd Co. However, when we tick the relevant FRS box on the VAT registration application, the system is telling us that the client is not eligible as his turnover is over the £150,000 FRS entry threshold. Is the client not allowed to continue to use FRS if the VAT number from the sole proprietor is transferred to the Ltd Co?

VAT Answer

Unfortunately, the simple answer to the question is ‘No’.

While the transfer of a VAT number means that the new entity taking over the VAT number takes over the responsibility for the debts and liabilities of the previous entity, the use of schemes by the previous entity, or other issues, such as an Options to Tax made by the previous entity, do not transfer to the new entity with the VAT number.

This is because, under the relevant VAT legislation, the VAT registration of the new entity is treated as a new registration, even though the VAT number allocated to this new registration is that previously used by the previous entity.

As such, the new entity must make a new application for a scheme such as FRS, and, as this is a new application, entry is based on the turnover at the time of the new application; the fact that the previous entity was using FRS doesn’t alter this.

Therefore, as the Ltd Co’s turnover is over the £150,000 entry threshold, the Ltd Co is not eligible to join FRS.

Related VAT Questions

My Client is Only Just Over the VAT Registration Threshold!

I have just completed my client’s income tax self-assessment for the tax year ending 5 April 2024 and have noted that the client’s turnover went over the VAT registration threshold in March

Supply of E-Publications

My client has their own website on which they make sales of e-books, which are downloaded by customers worldwide. My client’s customers are consumers rather than businesses, and these e-books mee

Train Hire for the Purpose of Providing Santa Specials

My client is a historic railway. In previous years they have sold Santa Specials; however, this year a third-party company will organise and sell the Santa Specials to the end customers. My client

Evidence of Zero-Rate Building Services Regarding New Dwelling

My client is a DIY housebuilder and has engaged the services of a building contractor to build the house for them. The contractor is insisting that, in order for him to zero-rate his supplies to my

VAT on Baby Clothes

My client, who sells baby gifts and accessories, has just registered for VAT. Are these zero-rated supplies like children’s clothing? Items sold include baby sized towels, muslin cloths, blankets

Payroll for UK employees going to work overseas and offshore remote workers

We are frequently asked to advise on the Income Tax and National Insurance treatment of UK employees who are being sent to work overseas, and employees who will work remotely from an offshore locat

Vantage Fee Protect Customer Testimonials

Having changed over to Vantage a couple of years ago we have been very satisfied with the service. Especially the claims handling and technical advice lines for both our firm and insured clients on employment and business legal matters. The webshop Vantage offer allows our clients to join and pay electronically. This positively impacts our bottom line and makes things simple and efficient for our clients.

Linda Giles Chartered Accountant

Real people, real results

Vantage Fee Protect provide market leading Tax Fee Protection
Insurance schemes through accountants.

Don’t be shy,
get in touch

Vantage Fee Protect provide market leading Tax Fee Protection
Insurance schemes through accountants.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.